<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1027 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 272A(2) of the Income Tax Act for failure to furnish quarterly e-TDS returns. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, granting the assessee another opportunity to present their case and provide a reasonable cause for the delay. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of fairness in the proceedings and ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 17:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1027 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 272A(2) of the Income Tax Act for failure to furnish quarterly e-TDS returns. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision, granting the assessee another opportunity to present their case and provide a reasonable cause for the delay. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of fairness in the proceedings and ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>