<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 683 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s decision on the computation of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) under the Income-tax Act. The rejection of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method and the adoption of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) were contested, highlighting the non-comparability of selected comparables. The Tribunal found the comparables inadequate and remitted the matter for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer. The decision favored the assessee, granting a fair hearing and requiring a reassessment of the ALP computation method and comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 17:26:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 683 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s decision on the computation of Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) under the Income-tax Act. The rejection of the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method and the adoption of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) were contested, highlighting the non-comparability of selected comparables. The Tribunal found the comparables inadequate and remitted the matter for reconsideration by the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer. The decision favored the assessee, granting a fair hearing and requiring a reassessment of the ALP computation method and comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>