<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (4) TMI 110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186015</link>
    <description>A voluntary return filed within the four-year limitation period bars reassessment under section 34; because the assessee filed a valid voluntary return for 1954-55 before expiry of that period, reassessment and the consequent penalty were quashed. Returns filed after the four-year period do not preclude initiation of section 34 proceedings, but an assessee may elect, upon service of a valid section 34 notice, to have a previously filed late document treated as the return in response to that notice. Challenges to penalties and recovery for other years based on failure to apply the proviso on remittances were dismissed as matters of evidentiary determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 17:20:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (4) TMI 110 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186015</link>
      <description>A voluntary return filed within the four-year limitation period bars reassessment under section 34; because the assessee filed a valid voluntary return for 1954-55 before expiry of that period, reassessment and the consequent penalty were quashed. Returns filed after the four-year period do not preclude initiation of section 34 proceedings, but an assessee may elect, upon service of a valid section 34 notice, to have a previously filed late document treated as the return in response to that notice. Challenges to penalties and recovery for other years based on failure to apply the proviso on remittances were dismissed as matters of evidentiary determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>