<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 161 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4675</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the violation of natural justice principles in passing the order-in-appeal. The Tribunal stressed the significance of procedural fairness and ensuring all parties have a fair chance to present their case before a decision is made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 161 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4675</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the violation of natural justice principles in passing the order-in-appeal. The Tribunal stressed the significance of procedural fairness and ensuring all parties have a fair chance to present their case before a decision is made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>