https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186011 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that transportation charges reimbursed by M/s Grasim Industries were not to be included in the assessable value of the C&F agent service. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for verification, clarifying the power of remand post-amendment to Section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. en-us Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 17:10:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186011 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that transportation charges reimbursed by M/s Grasim Industries were not to be included in the assessable value of the C&F agent service. The case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for verification, clarifying the power of remand post-amendment to Section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186011