<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186012</link>
    <description>A bad debt is deductible once it is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts, and after 1 April 1989 it is unnecessary to prove actual irrecoverability; the claim was also supported by section 36(2) because the relevant amounts had earlier been taken into account in computing income. In broker-client transactions, brokerage credited to the profit and loss account satisfied the statutory condition, so the bad-debt disallowance was deleted. A disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for professional fees paid to a non-resident could not be sustained without first examining whether the remittance was chargeable to tax in India under section 195, including the nature of services, treaty position and permanent establishment; that issue was remitted for fresh adjudication. The claim relating to adjustment of earlier years&#039; deemed speculation loss against share-trading income was also sent back for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186012</link>
      <description>A bad debt is deductible once it is written off as irrecoverable in the accounts, and after 1 April 1989 it is unnecessary to prove actual irrecoverability; the claim was also supported by section 36(2) because the relevant amounts had earlier been taken into account in computing income. In broker-client transactions, brokerage credited to the profit and loss account satisfied the statutory condition, so the bad-debt disallowance was deleted. A disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for professional fees paid to a non-resident could not be sustained without first examining whether the remittance was chargeable to tax in India under section 195, including the nature of services, treaty position and permanent establishment; that issue was remitted for fresh adjudication. The claim relating to adjustment of earlier years&#039; deemed speculation loss against share-trading income was also sent back for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>