<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 189 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the VCES declaration due to non-payment by the specified deadline, rejecting the condonation argument based on a system error. Additionally, the Tribunal found the show cause notice timely despite being issued within one month of declaration, emphasizing compliance with the VCES scheme&#039;s strict timelines and lack of provisions for delay condonation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the rejection of the declaration for non-compliance with payment deadlines and absence of provisions for condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 189 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the VCES declaration due to non-payment by the specified deadline, rejecting the condonation argument based on a system error. Additionally, the Tribunal found the show cause notice timely despite being issued within one month of declaration, emphasizing compliance with the VCES scheme&#039;s strict timelines and lack of provisions for delay condonation. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the rejection of the declaration for non-compliance with payment deadlines and absence of provisions for condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>