<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 159 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4672</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of duty on &quot;floatation reject.&quot; The Tribunal found that the item did not meet the criteria for excisability as it was not considered an &#039;article&#039; under the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. It emphasized the lack of evidence supporting excisability and the failure to classify the commodity as an &#039;article.&#039; As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit, stayed the recovery of duty and penalty amounts, and decided in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 159 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4672</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the demand of duty on &quot;floatation reject.&quot; The Tribunal found that the item did not meet the criteria for excisability as it was not considered an &#039;article&#039; under the Central Excise Tariff Schedule. It emphasized the lack of evidence supporting excisability and the failure to classify the commodity as an &#039;article.&#039; As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit, stayed the recovery of duty and penalty amounts, and decided in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>