https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186003 The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for hearing. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order on the deletion of expenses by adding Fringe Benefit Tax on 40% of expenses, upholding the action of the Assessing Officer. The issue of considering expenses under a specific clause was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination as the nature of these expenses was not clarified by the assessee during previous proceedings. en-us Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 15:09:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186003 The appeal by the revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for hearing. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s order on the deletion of expenses by adding Fringe Benefit Tax on 40% of expenses, upholding the action of the Assessing Officer. The issue of considering expenses under a specific clause was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination as the nature of these expenses was not clarified by the assessee during previous proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186003