<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 746 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186001</link>
    <description>The ITAT vacated the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of Rs. 19,00,000 addition on account of FDRs, directing further investigation by the AO due to non-submission of the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order. Emphasizing the importance of the final order in determining tax liability, the ITAT reiterated its directions, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The CIT(A) was criticized for upholding the addition without proper adjudication of evidence, leading the ITAT to stress compliance with their directives regarding the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 14:40:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 746 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186001</link>
      <description>The ITAT vacated the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of Rs. 19,00,000 addition on account of FDRs, directing further investigation by the AO due to non-submission of the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order. Emphasizing the importance of the final order in determining tax liability, the ITAT reiterated its directions, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The CIT(A) was criticized for upholding the addition without proper adjudication of evidence, leading the ITAT to stress compliance with their directives regarding the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=186001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>