<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 185 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331924</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application for Fixation of Special Rate of Actual Value Addition due to a time-limit bar, emphasizing the need to consider cases on their merits rather than technicalities. The Court directed the application to be reconsidered by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Shillong, highlighting the importance of reasoned decisions based on merits in administrative matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440125" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 185 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331924</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application for Fixation of Special Rate of Actual Value Addition due to a time-limit bar, emphasizing the need to consider cases on their merits rather than technicalities. The Court directed the application to be reconsidered by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Shillong, highlighting the importance of reasoned decisions based on merits in administrative matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>