<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 181 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331920</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit was denied where the record showed alleged diversion of goods and issuance of invoices without receipt of goods. The Tribunal found the proceedings, modus operandi, recorded statements and role of the participants materially identical to an earlier decision involving the same scrap procurement and invoice transmission pattern. As the defence raised was also the same as in that matter, the earlier Tribunal ruling was followed and the findings confirming denial of credit, interest and penalties were left undisturbed. The challenge therefore failed and the appeals were rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2016 22:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 181 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331920</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit was denied where the record showed alleged diversion of goods and issuance of invoices without receipt of goods. The Tribunal found the proceedings, modus operandi, recorded statements and role of the participants materially identical to an earlier decision involving the same scrap procurement and invoice transmission pattern. As the defence raised was also the same as in that matter, the earlier Tribunal ruling was followed and the findings confirming denial of credit, interest and penalties were left undisturbed. The challenge therefore failed and the appeals were rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>