https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185995 The tribunal, represented by Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial Member, found merit in the appellant's arguments and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs, if any. The judgment emphasized the integral connection between the services provided by sister concerns and the manufacturing activities of the appellant, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant by rejecting the department's stance on disallowing the credit. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 17:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185995 The tribunal, represented by Ms. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Judicial Member, found merit in the appellant's arguments and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs, if any. The judgment emphasized the integral connection between the services provided by sister concerns and the manufacturing activities of the appellant, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant by rejecting the department's stance on disallowing the credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 17 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185995