https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185996 Delay in filing an appeal was not condoned where the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 152-day delay. The Tribunal found the explanation unconvincing, as the applicant had not taken timely legal advice, had not acted promptly to pursue the matter, and merely relied on the need to obtain duplicate challans from the bank. This conduct was treated as gross negligence and inaction, and the condonation request was rejected, leaving the appeal not entertainable. en-us Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:13:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185996 Delay in filing an appeal was not condoned where the applicant failed to show sufficient cause for the 152-day delay. The Tribunal found the explanation unconvincing, as the applicant had not taken timely legal advice, had not acted promptly to pursue the matter, and merely relied on the need to obtain duplicate challans from the bank. This conduct was treated as gross negligence and inaction, and the condonation request was rejected, leaving the appeal not entertainable. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 30 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185996