<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 157 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the investment company, ruling that the finance charges were an accrued liability and should be deductible. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)&#039;s view that the liability was contingent and not allowable under Section 37 or Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 157 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the investment company, ruling that the finance charges were an accrued liability and should be deductible. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer and CIT(A)&#039;s view that the liability was contingent and not allowable under Section 37 or Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>