<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 581 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the interpretation of retention money under the mercantile system of accounting. It held that retention money does not accrue to the contractor until the guarantee period is over, affirming previous decisions and the assessee&#039;s consistent approach to taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 11:56:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 581 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals regarding the interpretation of retention money under the mercantile system of accounting. It held that retention money does not accrue to the contractor until the guarantee period is over, affirming previous decisions and the assessee&#039;s consistent approach to taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>