<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1237 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in its entirety, dismissing the appeals and emphasizing the necessity of specific defects in books of accounts to justify rejection and additions. It validated the correct calculation of exchange rate differences according to prescribed rules and accounting standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 18:03:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1237 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in its entirety, dismissing the appeals and emphasizing the necessity of specific defects in books of accounts to justify rejection and additions. It validated the correct calculation of exchange rate differences according to prescribed rules and accounting standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>