<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331874</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petitions, setting aside the impugned orders, as the Revisionary Authority&#039;s order, being of the same rank as the appellate authority, was deemed impermissible based on legal principles. The State was granted the opportunity to proceed afresh in compliance with the law, safeguarding the parties&#039; rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 135 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331874</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petitions, setting aside the impugned orders, as the Revisionary Authority&#039;s order, being of the same rank as the appellate authority, was deemed impermissible based on legal principles. The State was granted the opportunity to proceed afresh in compliance with the law, safeguarding the parties&#039; rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>