<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 133 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331872</link>
    <description>Issue 1 dealt with liability for interest on wrongly taken cenvat credit reversed before utilization. The Karnataka HC held that interest was not payable if credit was reversed before utilization, overturning the demand for interest. Issue 2 involved entitlement to cenvat credit on input service tax for Brokerage and Commission services. The denial of credit was overturned as the services were found to be directly linked to manufacturing activities. The Tribunal supported the eligibility of brokerage/commission services for credit. Consequently, all three appeals were allowed, setting aside the impugned orders and providing necessary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 133 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331872</link>
      <description>Issue 1 dealt with liability for interest on wrongly taken cenvat credit reversed before utilization. The Karnataka HC held that interest was not payable if credit was reversed before utilization, overturning the demand for interest. Issue 2 involved entitlement to cenvat credit on input service tax for Brokerage and Commission services. The denial of credit was overturned as the services were found to be directly linked to manufacturing activities. The Tribunal supported the eligibility of brokerage/commission services for credit. Consequently, all three appeals were allowed, setting aside the impugned orders and providing necessary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>