<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 127 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331866</link>
    <description>The judgment set aside the impugned order remanding the appeal to the Assistant Commissioner and allowed the appeal by way of remand for a fresh decision by the Jurisdictional Original Authority. The Authority was directed to examine all evidence, consider the previous remand order, and provide the appellant with an opportunity to present their case before issuing a new order, aiming to bring finality to the matter and ensure a just decision based on all available evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=440001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 127 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331866</link>
      <description>The judgment set aside the impugned order remanding the appeal to the Assistant Commissioner and allowed the appeal by way of remand for a fresh decision by the Jurisdictional Original Authority. The Authority was directed to examine all evidence, consider the previous remand order, and provide the appellant with an opportunity to present their case before issuing a new order, aiming to bring finality to the matter and ensure a just decision based on all available evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>