<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 927 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185966</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition made by the AO under Section 69, reversed the finding on the invalidity of the reference to the DVO, and directed the AO to accept the book results declared by the assessee for the contract business. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper procedural adherence and consideration of expert opinions in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 17:11:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 927 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185966</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition made by the AO under Section 69, reversed the finding on the invalidity of the reference to the DVO, and directed the AO to accept the book results declared by the assessee for the contract business. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper procedural adherence and consideration of expert opinions in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>