<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 121 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the concessional rate of additional duty and criticizing the first appellate authority&#039;s failure to adhere to judicial discipline and hierarchy. The Tribunal highlighted the need for judicial discipline to prevent unnecessary litigation and ensure the efficient functioning of the appellate system in tax administration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 121 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s eligibility for the concessional rate of additional duty and criticizing the first appellate authority&#039;s failure to adhere to judicial discipline and hierarchy. The Tribunal highlighted the need for judicial discipline to prevent unnecessary litigation and ensure the efficient functioning of the appellate system in tax administration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>