<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1253 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185953</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal by the revenue, affirming that the addition of `30,00,000/- on account of commission/bonus paid to a director was rightly deleted. The payments were deemed justified as incentives linked to the company&#039;s profitability, not subject to section 36(1)(ii) but falling under business expediency principles. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling aligned with the view that the remuneration was directly related to improving the company&#039;s operations, emphasizing the legitimate nature of the payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 12:07:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1253 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185953</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal by the revenue, affirming that the addition of `30,00,000/- on account of commission/bonus paid to a director was rightly deleted. The payments were deemed justified as incentives linked to the company&#039;s profitability, not subject to section 36(1)(ii) but falling under business expediency principles. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling aligned with the view that the remuneration was directly related to improving the company&#039;s operations, emphasizing the legitimate nature of the payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>