<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1410 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185951</link>
    <description>Expenditure by way of grants disbursed for objects and purposes authorised by an assessee&#039;s enabling statute may qualify for deduction under section 36(1)(xii) if it is not capital in nature. The Tribunal noted that non-refundable grants were said to be allowable only on actual utilisation and after Fund Utilisation Reports, while the Revenue treated the amounts as conditional loans under the grant terms. Because the factual position on whether the disbursements came from grants received in the relevant year and whether deduction was claimed only after actual use required verification, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439973" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1410 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185951</link>
      <description>Expenditure by way of grants disbursed for objects and purposes authorised by an assessee&#039;s enabling statute may qualify for deduction under section 36(1)(xii) if it is not capital in nature. The Tribunal noted that non-refundable grants were said to be allowable only on actual utilisation and after Fund Utilisation Reports, while the Revenue treated the amounts as conditional loans under the grant terms. Because the factual position on whether the disbursements came from grants received in the relevant year and whether deduction was claimed only after actual use required verification, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>