<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 331 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185950</link>
    <description>Food, tea and similar refreshment expenses incurred for adatias and customers were treated as messing expenses rather than entertainment expenses under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Such expenditure did not fall within the statutory disallowance for entertainment expenses, despite the contrary view previously relied on by the Tribunal. The expenses were therefore allowable as business expenditure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 331 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185950</link>
      <description>Food, tea and similar refreshment expenses incurred for adatias and customers were treated as messing expenses rather than entertainment expenses under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Such expenditure did not fall within the statutory disallowance for entertainment expenses, despite the contrary view previously relied on by the Tribunal. The expenses were therefore allowable as business expenditure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>