<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1186 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185947</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the disallowance of interest payable under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the validity of the transaction between the assessee and ICICI, as well as the entitlement of the assessee for lease rent as a hire purchaser, based on precedent set in a previous case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 11:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1186 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185947</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the disallowance of interest payable under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court also affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the validity of the transaction between the assessee and ICICI, as well as the entitlement of the assessee for lease rent as a hire purchaser, based on precedent set in a previous case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>