<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 105 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to allow the deduction under section 35AC for a donation made to Mahila Utkarsh Sansthan, Indore. Despite initial denials and discrepancies, the Tribunal found that the Assessee met all conditions for the deduction, including compliance with Form No. 58A and approval of the institution. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the legitimacy of the deduction claimed by the Assessee, highlighting the importance of adhering to the provisions of section 35AC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 09:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 105 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to allow the deduction under section 35AC for a donation made to Mahila Utkarsh Sansthan, Indore. Despite initial denials and discrepancies, the Tribunal found that the Assessee met all conditions for the deduction, including compliance with Form No. 58A and approval of the institution. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the legitimacy of the deduction claimed by the Assessee, highlighting the importance of adhering to the provisions of section 35AC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>