<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1085 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185930</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 7,50,000 within six weeks to comply with an ex-parte stay order involving a duty amount of Rs. 42,00,000. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed initially due to non-compliance with the deposit directive related to the classification of products, specifically Brahmi Amla Hair Oil and natural hair wash powder. The Tribunal stressed the importance of adhering to the deposit requirement for the appeal process to move forward effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 08:52:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1085 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185930</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI directed the appellant to deposit Rs. 7,50,000 within six weeks to comply with an ex-parte stay order involving a duty amount of Rs. 42,00,000. The appellant&#039;s appeal was dismissed initially due to non-compliance with the deposit directive related to the classification of products, specifically Brahmi Amla Hair Oil and natural hair wash powder. The Tribunal stressed the importance of adhering to the deposit requirement for the appeal process to move forward effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>