https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185931 The case involved a dispute regarding denial of Cenvat credit for iron and steel items used as supporting structurals. The Tribunal found the demand raised to be time-barred, referencing previous decisions to support this conclusion. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed solely on the issue of limitation. The judgment was delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Mr. Rakesh Kumar of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI. en-us Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Sep 2016 08:52:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185931 The case involved a dispute regarding denial of Cenvat credit for iron and steel items used as supporting structurals. The Tribunal found the demand raised to be time-barred, referencing previous decisions to support this conclusion. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed solely on the issue of limitation. The judgment was delivered by Ms. Archana Wadhwa and Mr. Rakesh Kumar of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185931