<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1084 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185929</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the demand for denial of Cenvat credit on iron and steel items used as structurals for the period February 2007 to December 2007. The Tribunal ruled that the demand was barred by limitation, citing previous decisions and emphasizing the absence of malafide intent. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants, and the stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1084 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185929</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the demand for denial of Cenvat credit on iron and steel items used as structurals for the period February 2007 to December 2007. The Tribunal ruled that the demand was barred by limitation, citing previous decisions and emphasizing the absence of malafide intent. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants, and the stay petition and appeal were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>