<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1154 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the credit availed on MS items for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery was admissible based on legal precedents and interpretation of &#039;inputs.&#039; The impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2016 08:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1154 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the credit availed on MS items for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery was admissible based on legal precedents and interpretation of &#039;inputs.&#039; The impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>