<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1460 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185924</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the AO to grant the exemption under section 54F of the Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee had complied with the conditions by investing the entire net consideration within the stipulated period and substantially completing the construction. The Tribunal dismissed the ground related to charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C, stating it is mandatory and consequential in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 18:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1460 - ITAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185924</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the AO to grant the exemption under section 54F of the Act. The Tribunal held that the assessee had complied with the conditions by investing the entire net consideration within the stipulated period and substantially completing the construction. The Tribunal dismissed the ground related to charging of interest under sections 234B and 234C, stating it is mandatory and consequential in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>