<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a clearing and forwarding agent, in a service tax dispute. The issue centered on whether reimbursable expenses from the principal should be included in the taxable value of services. The Tribunal found in line with precedents that such expenses should not be considered in the assessable value. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalties were set aside, granting relief to the appellant. The decision was rendered on 22.08.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 98 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a clearing and forwarding agent, in a service tax dispute. The issue centered on whether reimbursable expenses from the principal should be included in the taxable value of services. The Tribunal found in line with precedents that such expenses should not be considered in the assessable value. Consequently, the demand for service tax and penalties were set aside, granting relief to the appellant. The decision was rendered on 22.08.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>