<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 95 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund of Service Tax paid on CHA Services and Terminal Handling Charges for the export of goods. The Tribunal held that the amendment to the notification had retrospective effect, making specified services eligible for refund if used beyond the place of production or manufacture of the goods. Consequently, the Order-in-Appeal was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 95 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant the refund of Service Tax paid on CHA Services and Terminal Handling Charges for the export of goods. The Tribunal held that the amendment to the notification had retrospective effect, making specified services eligible for refund if used beyond the place of production or manufacture of the goods. Consequently, the Order-in-Appeal was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>