https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331828 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar mill, partially allowing the appeal regarding the availment of Cenvat credit on Iron & Steel structures and Asbestos cement products. While upholding the exclusion of Asbestos sheets from capital goods classification, the Tribunal found the invocation of the extended period unjustified due to the timely reflection of credit in returns and the appellant's cooperation. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside on limitation grounds, resulting in the partial success of the appellant's appeal. en-us Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Feb 2017 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331828 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar mill, partially allowing the appeal regarding the availment of Cenvat credit on Iron & Steel structures and Asbestos cement products. While upholding the exclusion of Asbestos sheets from capital goods classification, the Tribunal found the invocation of the extended period unjustified due to the timely reflection of credit in returns and the appellant's cooperation. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside on limitation grounds, resulting in the partial success of the appellant's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331828