<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 85 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the Appellant, granting CENVAT credit on specific steel items used in the manufacturing process, including MS Flats, Sheets, Bolts, and Plates. The Tribunal considered the items as capital goods based on precedents and previous judgments, overturning the Order-in-Appeal&#039;s decision to demand credit, interest, and penalty. The Appellant successfully argued for the admissibility of credit on steel items used for repair and maintenance, citing relevant precedents and settled legal principles. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was influenced by established legal principles and precedents, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant regarding the eligibility of CENVAT credit on the disputed steel items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 85 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the Appellant, granting CENVAT credit on specific steel items used in the manufacturing process, including MS Flats, Sheets, Bolts, and Plates. The Tribunal considered the items as capital goods based on precedents and previous judgments, overturning the Order-in-Appeal&#039;s decision to demand credit, interest, and penalty. The Appellant successfully argued for the admissibility of credit on steel items used for repair and maintenance, citing relevant precedents and settled legal principles. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was influenced by established legal principles and precedents, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant regarding the eligibility of CENVAT credit on the disputed steel items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>