<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 81 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331820</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the waiver of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was partly allowed. The penalty amount imposed under Section 78 was reduced to 25% of the original penalty imposed, considering the appellant&#039;s bonafide actions in discharging the entire tax liability with interest. The appeal resulted in a modification of the impugned order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:02:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 81 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331820</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the waiver of penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 was partly allowed. The penalty amount imposed under Section 78 was reduced to 25% of the original penalty imposed, considering the appellant&#039;s bonafide actions in discharging the entire tax liability with interest. The appeal resulted in a modification of the impugned order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>