<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 78 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331817</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the denovo order due to improper examination of Modvat Credit claim and failure to quantify duty payable as directed. The order was deemed incomplete and legally flawed, addressing only the rejection of Modvat Credit without determining duty recovery, fines, and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of following its directions, remanding the matter for proper consideration, including thorough examination of the Modvat Credit claim and addressing all aspects of the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 14:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 78 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331817</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the denovo order due to improper examination of Modvat Credit claim and failure to quantify duty payable as directed. The order was deemed incomplete and legally flawed, addressing only the rejection of Modvat Credit without determining duty recovery, fines, and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of following its directions, remanding the matter for proper consideration, including thorough examination of the Modvat Credit claim and addressing all aspects of the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>