<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 238 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4643</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. TAFE Limited, Chennai, restoring the original order sanctioning the rebate claim of Rs. 4,31,005/- for exported Hydraulic Pumps. Despite the jurisdictional issue, the Tribunal found the rebate claim to be valid and in order, emphasizing that seeking approval from the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of the manufacturer would not alter the outcome. The decision was based on the acceptance of a similar claim by the department previously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 238 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4643</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. TAFE Limited, Chennai, restoring the original order sanctioning the rebate claim of Rs. 4,31,005/- for exported Hydraulic Pumps. Despite the jurisdictional issue, the Tribunal found the rebate claim to be valid and in order, emphasizing that seeking approval from the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of the manufacturer would not alter the outcome. The decision was based on the acceptance of a similar claim by the department previously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>