<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1066 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable due to lack of evidence showing actual receipt of higher amounts than declared. The penalty imposed by the CIT(A) was deleted, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 05/06/2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 11:44:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1066 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not applicable due to lack of evidence showing actual receipt of higher amounts than declared. The penalty imposed by the CIT(A) was deleted, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 05/06/2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>