<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1463 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to deny cenvat credit and impose a penalty. The appellant&#039;s eligibility for cenvat credit related to crushing charges for iron ore was upheld, as the charges qualified as &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the appellant had complied with all requirements for claiming cenvat credit and that there was no provision allowing denial of such benefit in the circumstances. Consequently, the denial of cenvat credit was deemed unjustifiable, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1463 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to deny cenvat credit and impose a penalty. The appellant&#039;s eligibility for cenvat credit related to crushing charges for iron ore was upheld, as the charges qualified as &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the appellant had complied with all requirements for claiming cenvat credit and that there was no provision allowing denial of such benefit in the circumstances. Consequently, the denial of cenvat credit was deemed unjustifiable, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>