<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331792</link>
    <description>The court found the search, summons, and arrest conducted by DGCEI on eBIZ to be illegal and impermissible under the Finance Act, 1994. It ruled in favor of eBIZ, directing the refund of the coerced payment, with interest, and awarded costs. An interim direction restrained further coercive actions by DGCEI, emphasizing adherence to procedural safeguards and the need for credible material before such actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331792</link>
      <description>The court found the search, summons, and arrest conducted by DGCEI on eBIZ to be illegal and impermissible under the Finance Act, 1994. It ruled in favor of eBIZ, directing the refund of the coerced payment, with interest, and awarded costs. An interim direction restrained further coercive actions by DGCEI, emphasizing adherence to procedural safeguards and the need for credible material before such actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>