<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 49 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331788</link>
    <description>Mere collection of subscription from members does not, by itself, bring a federation within the service-taxable category of club or association under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC noted that the issue had already been decided against the Revenue in binding precedent and was no longer res integra, so the Revenue could not tax the respondent-federation solely on the basis of member subscriptions. The appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 49 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331788</link>
      <description>Mere collection of subscription from members does not, by itself, bring a federation within the service-taxable category of club or association under Section 65 of the Finance Act, 1994. The HC noted that the issue had already been decided against the Revenue in binding precedent and was no longer res integra, so the Revenue could not tax the respondent-federation solely on the basis of member subscriptions. The appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>