<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 35 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331774</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both appeals, permitting the CENVAT Credit for steel materials used in construction while denying the credit for Asbestos sheets. The premature rejection of the refund claim was set aside, emphasizing the importance of finalizing the admissibility of credit before making such decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:53:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 35 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331774</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed both appeals, permitting the CENVAT Credit for steel materials used in construction while denying the credit for Asbestos sheets. The premature rejection of the refund claim was set aside, emphasizing the importance of finalizing the admissibility of credit before making such decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>