https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4633 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the remission application for Central Excise duty following a fire incident at the appellant's factory premises. The Commissioner found discrepancies in insurance claims, lack of adherence to fire security norms, and failure to prove the incident as a natural or unavoidable cause as required by Rule 21. The Tribunal agreed with these findings, emphasizing the appellant's failure to provide evidence regarding the fire's cause. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of remission based on the established facts and circumstances. en-us Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4633 The Tribunal upheld the rejection of the remission application for Central Excise duty following a fire incident at the appellant's factory premises. The Commissioner found discrepancies in insurance claims, lack of adherence to fire security norms, and failure to prove the incident as a natural or unavoidable cause as required by Rule 21. The Tribunal agreed with these findings, emphasizing the appellant's failure to provide evidence regarding the fire's cause. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of remission based on the established facts and circumstances. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4633