<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 14 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting penalties related to the non-disclosure of salary income and housing loan interest while upholding penalties on credit card expenses and interest on the saving bank account. The decision emphasized the importance of bona fide mistakes and the necessity of providing valid explanations for claimed deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:06:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 14 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting penalties related to the non-disclosure of salary income and housing loan interest while upholding penalties on credit card expenses and interest on the saving bank account. The decision emphasized the importance of bona fide mistakes and the necessity of providing valid explanations for claimed deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>