<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 7 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331746</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The Court found no error in the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer, as the evidence did not support any undisclosed income beyond what was disclosed in the development agreement. The judgment emphasized the factual nature of the case and upheld the concurrent findings that no additional income was earned by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2016 14:05:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 7 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331746</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Incometax (Appeals) and the Tribunal. The Court found no error in the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer, as the evidence did not support any undisclosed income beyond what was disclosed in the development agreement. The judgment emphasized the factual nature of the case and upheld the concurrent findings that no additional income was earned by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>