<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 716 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185871</link>
    <description>Section 10A exemption was upheld because the same issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own case for an earlier year and that view had been affirmed by the High Court. As no material factual distinction was shown for the year under review, the Tribunal followed the earlier on consistency grounds and sustained the relief granted to the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 716 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185871</link>
      <description>Section 10A exemption was upheld because the same issue had already been decided in the assessee&#039;s own case for an earlier year and that view had been affirmed by the High Court. As no material factual distinction was shown for the year under review, the Tribunal followed the earlier on consistency grounds and sustained the relief granted to the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>