<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1123 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331739</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement and set aside the penalties imposed, invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s financial challenges leading to delayed tax payments were considered, with the Tribunal ruling against penalty enhancement, emphasizing lack of deliberate evasion and financial constraints as reasons for the delay. The judgment was delivered on 01/08/2016 by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1123 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331739</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement and set aside the penalties imposed, invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant&#039;s financial challenges leading to delayed tax payments were considered, with the Tribunal ruling against penalty enhancement, emphasizing lack of deliberate evasion and financial constraints as reasons for the delay. The judgment was delivered on 01/08/2016 by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>