<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 228 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4625</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal granted a waiver of predeposit and a stay of recovery in a case where a manufacturing firm contested the demand for service tax on the grounds that they did not provide consulting engineering services as defined by the Finance Act. The Tribunal found that the department failed to prove that the disputed amount was actually received by the appellant, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument and holding that they had made a prima facie case against the demand and penalties. Consequently, the waiver and stay were granted in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 228 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4625</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal granted a waiver of predeposit and a stay of recovery in a case where a manufacturing firm contested the demand for service tax on the grounds that they did not provide consulting engineering services as defined by the Finance Act. The Tribunal found that the department failed to prove that the disputed amount was actually received by the appellant, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument and holding that they had made a prima facie case against the demand and penalties. Consequently, the waiver and stay were granted in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>